{"id":298,"date":"2006-08-07T00:17:47","date_gmt":"2006-08-07T04:17:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/wordpress\/is_our_fantasy_readers_learning"},"modified":"2006-08-07T00:17:47","modified_gmt":"2006-08-07T04:17:47","slug":"is_our_fantasy_readers_learning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/2006\/08\/is_our_fantasy_readers_learning.html","title":{"rendered":"Is Our Fantasy Readers Learning?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Charles Stross, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.antipope.org\/charlie\/blog-static\/2006\/08\/genre_neuroses_101.html\">Genre neuroses 101<\/a>&#8220;:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Finally, there is the blasted heath that is fantasy. At least the two decade long post Lord of the Rings hang-over is mostly over, and the post-movie-trilogy bean fest has faded somewhat. There&#8217;s some really interesting stuff going on there (paging Paul Park, Paul Park to the white courtesy phone &mdash; or Steven Brust, at a pinch). <strong>But fantasy is, almost by definition, consolatory and escapist literature.<\/strong> Pure fantasy doesn&#8217;t really tell us anything about the world we live in, and I fail to discern any huge new movements sweeping the field as symptoms of the cultural neuroses of one country or another.&#8221; (emphasis mine)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Two problems with the sentence in bold. <\/p>\n<p>First, fantasy is <em>not<\/em> &#8220;by definition&#8221; consolatory and escapist. <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk\/isj88\/newsinger.htm\">Not even China Mieville believes that<\/a>. It is trivial to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.xmission.com\/~shpshftr\/GC\/GC-Home.html\">come<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/skzbrust.livejournal.com\/\">up<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hplovecraft.com\/\">with<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/China_Mi&eacute;ville\">counterexamples<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>Second, why is &#8220;consolatory&#8221; fantasy so obviously inferior to &#8220;unsettling&#8221; fantasy? I can agree that fantasy that rattles our sensibilities <em>can<\/em> be excellent. But saying that excellent fantasy <em>must<\/em> rattle our sensibilities, that&#8217;s not qualitatively different from saying that all excellent fantasy should Teach Us Something. Ugh. Look, I don&#8217;t mind if you enjoy attempting to OMG R0X0r OUR W0rldvi3w!!!11one1!!, but please, don&#8217;t assume that&#8217;s the end-all be-all goal for fiction.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and another thing. &#8220;Pure fantasy doesn&#8217;t really tell us anything about the world&#8230;&#8221; Umm, if this is a reference to fundamentally aphysical nature of fantasy, please do keep in mind that 98% of SF, even &#8220;hard SF&#8221;, is equally aphysical. Those &#8220;nanobot\/Singularity&#8221; stories that are so hip these days? They&#8217;re as grounded in reality as the latest offering from <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.laurellkhamilton.org\/\">Laurel K. Hamilton<\/a>. Not that nanobot stories can&#8217;t be fun and all, but if you&#8217;re actually taking them <em>seriously<\/em>, well, that faint murmuring you&#8217;re hearing is the sound of a thousand condensed-matter physicists snickering.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>But saying that excellent fiction <em>must<\/em> rattle our sensibilities&#8230; well, that&#8217;s not qualitatively different from saying that all good fantasy should Teach Us Something. Ugh. Look, I don&#8217;t mind if you enjoy attempting to OMG R0X0r OUR W0rldvi3w!!!11one1!!, but please, don&#8217;t assume that that&#8217;s the end-all be-all goal for fiction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sf"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goer.org\/Journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}