March 26, 2004

But I'm Not Sure About Frannie

Bad news: Adobe has killed FrameMaker for MacOS. I can assure you that the MacOS FrameMaker user community is outraged. Well... okay, I can only really assure you that half the MacOS FrameMaker user community is outraged. The other half consists of Francine Kopecki, a 53-year-old contract technical writer in Lansing, Michigan. Not exactly sure what Frannie thinks, but at least I'm plenty annoyed.

Of course, the writing was on the wall, so there's no point in being too upset. Some people speculate that if Adobe had gotten around to porting FrameMaker to OS X, it might have done a little better in the marketplace. I can certainly say that I would have snapped up an OS X version, but again, I can't speak for Frannie. Besides, FrameMaker would have just looked weird in OS X. Can you imagine taking that horrible CDE-inspired interface and spraying on a light coat of Aqua? Perhaps it's best that Adobe never unleashed that monstrosity on the unsuspecting public.

The only upside from all this has been amusing flood of Recommendations For FrameMaker Replacements From People Who Have Never In Their Lives Actually Used FrameMaker. InDesign? OpenOffice? Stop, you're killing me!

Well, at least we can all take comfort in the fact that Adobe's development efforts for FrameMaker are abysmally slow. It will probably be years before they manage to crank out FrameMaker 8.0, and the serious backwards-compatibility issues start in earnest. Huzzah for lack of competition! Still, unlike Adobe, I can't rest on my laurels. Even though the day of FrameMaker 8.0 is probably far off, it's important to start spewing a thick cloud of FUD at work now, well before my company decides to upgrade. "Did you hear? Adobe's using a new kind of shrinkwrap that's highly teratogenic." My luck, they'll just make me open the box.

Comments

  1. What are you complaining about? You’ve still got notepad haven’t you?

    Oh, Mac you say. Well, er, nevermind then.

    Posted by jgraham on Mar. 28, 2004 at 3:19 PM [#]

  2. Hmmm, maybe you’re on to something, James. What am I complaining for when I’ve got TextEdit, vi… That’s all I need to hand-code my next manual in DocBook.

    Posted by Evan on Mar. 28, 2004 at 4:12 PM [#]

  3. … or (La)TeX.

    Posted by Chris Burkhardt on Mar. 30, 2004 at 11:22 AM [#]

  4. Interesting, I haven’t really taken a look at TeX since grad school. I suppose if someone slapped a good enough GUI on top of it, with the right set of features… honestly, I’m not familiar with what’s out there right now.

    Posted by Evan on Mar. 30, 2004 at 7:03 PM [#]

Post a Comment

(Optional, will not be shown)

(Optional)

Are you sentient?

Comments use Markdown syntax. HTML will be stripped out.

  • New para: two carriage returns
  • Emphasis: *emphasis*
  • Bulleted list: - bullet item
  • Ordered list: 1. numbered item
  • Blockquote: > "To the Batcave!"
  • URLs get automatically linked: http://yahoo.com
  • To create an inline link like Yahoo!: [Yahoo!](http://yahoo.com/)