goer.org

« Back Thursday | Main | Linkdump: Contrarians and Barbarians »

Here's Some Green Ink

Did I say back next Thursday? I meant back next Tuesday.

Today's business is to wish a hearty Happy Birthday to my friend Marissa. Welcome to your second quarter-century, kiddo -- it's all sagging, mysterious weight gain, and other instances of decrepitude from here on out. Yes, decrepitude. I, for one, have discovered that on a good morning I can run a little over a mile before collapsing in a gasping, wheezing heap. For crying out loud, I was on the varsity soccer team.1 This sucks.

But hey, here's what sucks worse: somebody decided to give M'ris a a big flaming sack of poop for her birthday. See, Marissa had mused that while writing is a difficult profession, so are all the other professions out there -- and that rather than overdramatizing our pain-as-writers, we should take care of business as best we can and move on. Just like nurses, carpenters, Marines, and so on. But no -- along comes this gentleman, who insists that no, no no, my pain-as-a-writer is super-special after all. (Fortunately, M'ris can take care of herself just fine.)

This all begs the question -- why are people so awfully sensitive about their own writing?

One theory might be that writers are necessarily sensitive, delicate souls who therefore wilt under the cruelties of rejection letters, bad editors, and mean family members.

The problem with this rather romantic theory is that most writers in the Real World aren't like that at all; or if they are, they've learned to deal. In my experience most professional writers quickly develop a thick, crusty shell for protection. If a critique or edit is good, you think about it and incorporate it; if it's crap, you ignore it (assuming business conditions permit). End of story.

Conversely, non-professionals are usually far more sensitive about their writing than professionals. Take it from me -- when an engineer writes a tech paper or a specification, getting him or her to sit down and go over some edits is like pulling teeth. It happens over and over again. One minute, we're cleaning up some API verbiage; the next minute, we're in a symposium on the Soul of the Postmodern American Writer with our special guest, Jonathan Franzen.

After several years, I think I'm starting to understand this behavior. Writing is always an ego-intensive process; whether you're writing fiction or an API specification,2 there's always a lot of you in there. It's just that the main difference between professionals and non-professionals is that non-professionals don't learn how to detach their ego when it needs to be detached.

For this reason, every writer and editor needs a bag of tricks for dealing with bruised egos. Here's one trick I've learned: never edit with red ink. Red ink makes people angry and defensive. Maybe it reminds them of bad experiences in high school English... or maybe red is just an angry color. Either way, I recommend switching to green ink. It makes a world of difference.

However, I'm still up in the air about smiley faces. On the one hand, smileys have powerful ameliorative properties. Just think! -- you can transform a proofreading mark that means "This whole paragraph sucks, and we're dropping it," to mean "This whole paragraph sucks, and we're dropping it -- but I mean that in the nicest of ways."

On the other hand, I can't bring myself to use smileys. Hey, I'm just not That Guy.

1. I didn't play very much, but still.

2. In some organizations the difference between the two is not as large as you might think.

Posted by Evan Goer on Jul. 29, 2003 at 11:08 AM | Comments (8)

Comments

  1. I'm not a smiley face guy either. :(

    Posted by Adiv on Jul. 29, 2003 at 3:09 PM

  2. Mostly true...but some pros decide that they're past their days of having to be thick-skinned and pitch fits whenever anyone dares criticize them. (coughEllisoncough)

    Columbine did post a follow-up, by the way, claiming that the problem was mostly that he's jealous of my internal motivation. Err, all right.

    Posted by Mris on Jul. 29, 2003 at 5:38 PM

  3. Heh. Well, there are always outliers when it comes to being professionally thick-skinned. (Perhaps this fits in with my earlier remarks on "decrepitude"?)

    As for that follow-up, I just read it. Jeez. I don't know the guy, but from here it looks like he's coming seriously unglued.

    Posted by Evan on Jul. 29, 2003 at 10:02 PM

  4. Speaking of red-ink - in footnote 2, didn't you mean "not as large as you might think" ??? :)

    Posted by Russ on Jul. 30, 2003 at 7:35 AM

  5. Errr... yes. Thanks, Russ.

    Good thing I have my thick protective writer's shell.

    Posted by Evan on Jul. 30, 2003 at 7:57 AM

  6. So are we supposed to stop using red ink altogether? What if accountants made the switch because it's more warm and fuzzy to say, "We're in the green!" rather than "We're in the red!". (Considerind the color of US dollars, it would make the statement rather ambiguous.)

    What if your make notes in pencil? I like pencil and it can be erased. Grey is not nearly as abrasive as red.

    Another thing you can do is add a question mark after your harsher/bigger comments. It gives the thin skinned writer the 'option' of deciding whether the correction is good or not. (It's a nice illusion.)

    Posted by Adiv on Jul. 30, 2003 at 9:50 PM

  7. Pencil is no good; it doesn't show up well. Black ink has the same problem, and dark blue ink isn't a whole lot better. You're pretty much stuck with red or green ink. (Purple ink would also work... but it's a little too metrosexual for my taste.)

    Posted by Evan on Jul. 31, 2003 at 2:32 PM

  8. Peacock blue and turquoise are fairly easy ink colors to find, both in stores (in fountain pen refills) and on a manuscript. But perhaps they are just as metrosexual as purple. I don't have that problem, being a chick and all. I can use pink ink and dot my i's with hearts, and people won't get the wrong impression of my sexuality. (Well, in the particulars, probably: girls like that have not shown a marked preference for hairy geekmen.)

    Posted by Mris on Aug. 01, 2003 at 6:33 AM

Post a comment

(Optional, but hides your email address)

Are you a spammer? (REQUIRED — you must select "No" to post.)

NOTE: For mysterious reasons, comment posting is extremely slow right now. It can take from 30-60 seconds after you hit "Submit" for your comment to post. However, your comment will go through; you shouldn't need to click the button again.

Comment Syntax

The basics:

  • For a new paragraph, enter two carriage returns.
  • Plain URLs such as http://www.yahoo.com automatically become links.
  • The system encodes all angle brackets and ampersands. For example, if you try to enter a HTML paragraph, the system displays the open tag literally as "<p>".

Show advanced syntax

About

This entry was posted on July 29, 2003 by Evan Goer.

For more entries, you can visit the main journal page or browse through the complete archives, which date back to 2001.

Subscribe to this Site

(What does subscribing mean?)

Copyright

Creative Commons License Text released under Creative Commons.

To use this license, you must attribute this work properly. This license does not extend to comments unless the original poster of that comment states otherwise.

Powered by Movable Type 3.33.

Home | About | Journal | HTML Tutorial

© Copyright 2001-2007, Evan Goer. Some Rights Reserved. Last Updated July 2, 2008.